See what exists
Understand detectable tools and supported usage surfaces, with clear distinctions between observed and unknown.
DISCOVERYWhen your AI tools are scattered, your usage story shouldn't be. UsageHarbor brings evidence about activity, capacity, and wasted effort into one privacy-minded Windows cockpit.
Early-stage product · No public installer or open pilot signup yet
Subscriptions, command-line tools, background workflows, rate limits, and usage logs each tell a different part of the story.
A percentage without a timestamp isn't reliable evidence. A cost estimate isn't a bill. And a full quota meter doesn't tell you why work was repeated.
UsageHarbor connects the pieces it can actually observe.
One local-first workflow, built around evidence and careful boundaries.
Understand detectable tools and supported usage surfaces, with clear distinctions between observed and unknown.
DISCOVERYKeep observations attached to their source and original time. Stale, absent, or incompatible values remain explicit.
PROVENANCEReview activity patterns, repeated work, and potential capacity pressure without manufacturing false savings.
ATTRIBUTIONGet evidence-backed recommendations to review. UsageHarbor does not choose or dispatch your AI models.
DECISIONSFeatures described here represent the active product direction and source-level implementation, not a promise that every provider or workflow is already supported.
Local-first is more than a label. The goal is useful answers without uploading your private conversations just to understand what your tools are doing.
Read supported evidence. Don't invent provider permissions, identities, prices, or quota guarantees.
Missing or expired source data stays unknown. An estimate never silently becomes a fact.
UsageHarbor describes usage and recommends changes. It doesn't autonomously launch or route AI workloads.
UsageHarbor has a tested Windows source foundation, including local capacity evidence and analysis. Public distribution is a separate milestone.
Read the FAQNot publicly yet. Source-level checks and internal development builds are not the same thing as a trusted, tested public installer.
Windows is the current development target. A public release and Mac or Linux support are not currently promised.
No. UsageHarbor reports evidence and recommendations. Provider admission and dispatch belong to a separate operator system.
Its design prioritizes metadata and bounded observations rather than retaining prompt or conversation bodies. Individual data-source support is still being validated.